You are here

Tam McTavish | 08.29.2018

My uncle, a backcountry guide, once told me that he enjoyed avalanche safety and backcountry skiing because it was like a murder mystery in reverse. You gather clues and make a rough assessment of what could lead to a ghastly murder. 

I've loved this sentiment. Perhaps because I like reverse engineering things to begin with, or perhaps because the same human dramas, egos, and element of danger that makes for a good page-turning detective novel are just as present in the backcountry. But there is a better phrase that has kept me safe. It's a touch of peer pressure, mixed in with my propensity for self-doubt. 

"How stupid is this going to look in the accident report?"

Every time I do something risky, I try and think about what the situation might look like if it all goes wrong. What risks might I have failed to calculate? What could I have done better? Because I spend a lot of time combing through accident reports and journals like the Accidents in North American Climbing, I find this helpful to remind me of things I've forgotten. More importantly, it makes me consider the situation externally. Are the risks really worth it? Can I justify my faith in the snow stability, rock fall risk, et cetera?

So far it's worked really well. 

But that might just be the confirmation bias speaking...

Comments

Have updates, photos, alerts, or just want to leave a comment?
Sign In and share them.